LRIG Logo The Laboratory Robotics Interest Group
Mid Atlantic Chapter




Home Up

 

 

The Laboratory Robotics Interest Group
Mid Atlantic Chapter

November 2008 Meeting

2008 LRIG Workshop on ADMET/PK

 

Date:  Wednesday, November 12, 2008   
Place:  Crowne Plaza Somerset-Bridgewater , 110 Davidson Avenue, Somerset NJ 08873
            Phone: 1-877-270-1393
Itinerary: Social Period w/appetizers:  4:30 to 5:45 pm
                Dinner:     5:45 to 6:30 PM
                Presentations:  6:30 to 9:00 PM
Registration:
  We have an on-line registration service at <https://www.lab-robotics.org/member/meetings.asp?rid=1>.  

 

Food and refreshments will be available FREE OF CHARGE during the Social Period.

There is always a Job posting board at the social.  Please encourage your recruiters to give you material to post and distribute.
Openings may be also posted at
https://www.lab-robotics.org/forum/default.asp?CAT_ID=2

There is no fee to attend the meeting.

Click here to view the PDF file of the agenda.

Presentation:  Practical human PK prediction approaches using in silico, in vitro and in vivo animal data
Dr. Handan He
Director and Head of Preclinical PK/PD
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.

The accurate prediction of human pharmacokinetic parameters based on early in vitro and in vivo preclinical data remains a major challenge in drug development. Various approaches have been published, each having their own advantages and limitations. The predictability of these approaches varies significantly and is largely dependent on individual compound properties and interspecies differences. There is an increased focus to use more mechanistic approaches, e.g. physiologically based pharmacokinetics, in addition to empirical methods, e.g. allometric scaling. Although mechanistic models (PBPK) allow an understanding of the effect physiological variables on pharmacokinetic parameters, the successful development and implementation of routine PBPK models is still limited, as significant experience, and resource intensive data are often required,. Thus, allometric scaling approaches have remained and expanded their uses as valuable tools in drug development. Of course, many theories and different approaches have been proposed for improving the predictive performance of allometry for CL, Vss and t1/2. Besides prediction of PK parameters, attempts have also been made to predict plasma concentration profiles. This presentation is to share our experience with you in predicting human PK parameters, e.g. CL, Vss, t1/2, ka and F% as well as oral PK profiles in plasma and tissues. To predict human CL, it is suggested to use multiple approaches to assess prediction confidence, e.g. IVIVC using microsomal or hepatocyte data, allometric scaling (rule of exponent), single species allometric scaling and fraction unbond corrected intercept method (FCIM). To predict Vss, 3 multiple species approaches e.g. Oie-Tozer, allometric scaling (1-3 species) and PBPK will be discussed. Moreover, many approaches for t1/2, ka, F% will also be recommended. In terms of PK profile prediction, PBPK, Wajima and twocompartmental allometric scaling will be among the choices. This presentation will not only describe scaling techniques using Novartis examples, but also highlight how to address interspecies differences to improve prediction confidence in the anticipation of human doses

Presentation:  Improving Candidate Quality Through the Prediction of Clinical Outcome
Dr. Simon Thomas
Head of Scientific Computing
Cyprotex Discovery Ltd

Despite ever-increasing discovery and preclinical budgets, and data generation for new compounds, most new compounds that enter clinical trials fail in Phases I or II. In essence, this is due to the difficulty of predicting fundamental pharmacological behaviour in human a priori. This prediction requires the combination of data from in vitro efficacy, ADME and toxicity screens, as well as the results obtained in animal models. The combination of all relevant data is necessary to help to predict the clinical outcome of the administration of a novel compound, and to guide lead optimisation and candidate selection. One means of achieving this combination of data is by simulation modelling. Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelling is becoming a widely established means of predicting pharmacokinetics, including the crucial aspects of target and non-target tissue exposure. Combining tissue dosimetry predictions from PBPK modelling with the modelling of drug action at target sites enables lead optimisation to be guided rationally by optimising on in vivo therapeutic effect. Incorporating toxicity data in the same manner increases the value of the approach. I shall present results of an ongoing study on PK/PD modelling of the statins, a group of compounds that reduce plasma LDL-cholesterol levels by inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase, an enzyme of the cholesterol synthesis pathway. I shall describe the use of ADME data generated in HT in vitro screens, activity data generated in receptor and cell-based in vitro screens, and PK and response data from preclinical species (and even from humans for the special case of e-too?drug development). The interplay between activity and ADME/PK data will be discussed, as will the continuing challenge of developing cost-effective alternatives to in vivo animal PK screens.

 

Presentation:  Formulation approaches in addressing PK Related Issues
Dr. Hong Wen
Pharmaceutical Development
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.

For each compound, its PK profile is affected by not only its physico-chemical and biopharmaceutical properties, but also the formulation design. Based on drug solubility and permeability, drugs have been classified into four classes. For those drugs with poor water solubility or low permeability, lots of research has been done to improve their bioavailability. Considering the Lead compound screen process, most new compounds are poorly water soluble, and most pharmaceutical development are focusing on improving their dissolution in the human GI tract. Besides, some drugs with narrow adsorption window, i.e. narrow adsorption region in human GI tract, some special delivery systems can help to improve the bioavailability by overcoming the short transit time of drug in those specific GI regions. Furthermore, some special delivery system like controlled release formulations can be useful for those drugs with short half, or narrow therapeutic window. Those controlled release formulation can improve patient compliance, as well as reduce side effects related to high Cmax.

 

Presentation:  R&D Knowledge Assessment Shapes Scientific Information Strategy
Bob Oara
Managing Partner
ResultWorks, LLC

At the highest level, Pharmaceutical R&D is supported by a number of formal and well developed scientific information systems that are carefully managed. These systems and the inherent scientific knowledge they support are quite visible to upper management. Yet over time, R&D communities employ of a variety of informal systems from spreadsheets to commercial systems that are often implemented nder the radar?of the formal IT support channels. Several pharmaceutical companies recently undertook an effort to assess the scientific information systems being used throughout their organizations, including formal as well as informal systems. They contracted with ResultWorks to perform a collaborative assessment of R&D knowledge assets from discovery through early development. These projects lead to better prioritization of R&D scientific information system needs, key knowledge assets and a roadmap of system initiatives for the future. This presentation will outline the business problems recognized by several clients, the approach undertaken to uncover and catalog scientific knowledge assets and the resulting strategic roadmap that became the foundation for guiding R&D scientific information system investments.

 

The Menu!

Little Italy

Fresh Baked Garlic Bread, Flatbreads, Assorted Rolls, Breadsticks
Caesar Salad

Mozzarella Capresa
Freshly Sliced Roma Tomatoes, Roasted Red Peppers, Sun-dried Tomatoes, Fresh Mozzarella and Topped with a Drizzle of Olive Oil, Garlic and Fresh Basil

Pasta eFagioli
A Robust Soup with Pasta and Beans

Grilled Chicken with Pesto Sauce, Sundried Tomatoes and Provolone Cheese

Sole a la Nina
Fillet of Sole with Sun Dried Tomatoes, Basil and Fresh Plum Tomatoes

Bistecca Giambotta
Grilled Sliced Steak Served with Fried Potatoes, Baked Mushrooms, Onions, Hot and Sweet Peppers

Pasta Station

Radiatorre, and Penne
served with Marinara or Pink Vodka Sauce

Eggplant Rollitini
Served with Saut嶪d Zucchini with Onions and Red Sauce and
Risotto

Dessert

Ricotta Cheesecake
Miniature Italian Pastries and Cookies
Assorted Sodas and bottled water

Freshly Brewed Columbian Coffee, Decaffeinated Coffee and Herbal Tea

 

Visit The Laboratory Robotics Interest Group homepage at https://www.lab-robotics.org


Send mail to [email protected] with questions or comments about this web site.
Copyright ?1999 Laboratory Robotics Interest Group
LRIG?is a trademark of the Laboratory Robotics Interest Group
Last modified: October 06, 2008

[LRIG Home]