|
1
|
- Christopher A. Lipinski
- Adjunct Senior Research Fellow
- Pfizer Global R&D
- Groton New London Labs
- Lipinskica@groton.pfizer.com
|
|
2
|
- Why?
- Chemical degradation
- Compound precipitation
- Why should cooling, freezing and modest warming cause a chemical change?
- Change to single freeze / thaw tube storage from plate based storage is
correct
- But historical reasoning has been wrong
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
- No disagreement
- Abbott
- freeze thaw cycles not a problem
- bone dry DMSO
- crystalline compounds studied
- Matrical / Pfizer
- freeze thaw cycles are a problem
- wet DMSO
- amorphous compounds studied
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
- Expected effects with contact sonication
- excellent mixing
- efficient cell lysis
- speed up equilibration time
- minor effect - may induce precipitation
- Unexpected effects
- 50% dissolving of precipitated samples
- light scattering data
- rescue of expired HTS plates
- similar dissolving with contact less acoustics
- Theory of re dissolving is speculative
|
|
8
|
- HTS master plate is frozen
- Primary hit in HTS screen
- Samples stored in frozen plates
- Plate is thawed
- Cherry pick “hits” for retest
- Water uptake by DMSO
- Plate is refrozen
- Cycle could be repeated many times
- How often nobody knows
- Registration system does not track freeze thaws
|
|
9
|
- Super saturation in DMSO is high
- possible to see freeze thaw effect
- Super saturation in DMSO is low to moderate
- difficult to see freeze thaw effect
- Water in DMSO increases super saturation
- Water in DMSO greatly decreases solubility
- A little water in DMSO decreases compound solubility a whole lot
|
|
10
|
- Erratic HTS screening results that seem to bear little or no
relationship to the biology and maybe even to the chemistry
- erratic rates of primary hits in HTS screens
- erratic re-confirm rates on primary HTS actives
- differences among screening sites
- differences among compound collections
|
|
11
|
- 70,000 compounds screened at Pfizer, Groton
- Capsugel Symposium June 2003 Tokyo
- solubility formulation, customer feedback
- Collaborator feedback to Matrical
- “Sonicman” HTS plate based sonicator
|
|
12
|
- 40% of compounds have poor aqueous solubility
- Half the problem due to size / lipophilicity
- Half the problem due to crystal packing
- DMSO no better than water for compounds insoluble due to crystal packing
- Suggests an upper limit of 20% compounds
insoluble in dry DMSO at 10uM
- supported by NCI Frederick, MD studies
- Will this limit ever be achieved?
- Depends on whether a nucleation event occurs
- Depends on number of freeze thaw cycles
|
|
13
|
- Ostwalds “rule of stages”
- Sequence of compound batch isolation proceeds towards thermodynamically
most stable form
- 1 - amorphous - highest energy solid form
- 2 - highest energy crystalline polymorph
- 3 - lowest energy crystalline polymorph
- Amorphous is the highest energy form
- most soluble in water and DMSO
|
|
14
|
- Pressure on chemistry to increase output
- crystallization has disappeared
- Combinatorial compounds are now being purified by automated procedures
- 85-95% pure by ELSD or UV
- Compounds “appear” more soluble
- amorphous state
- impurities enhance solubility
- crystal growth retardation
|
|
15
|
- Amorphous DMSO solubility is always higher than when compound is
crystalline
- Amorphous compounds from combichem or medchem initially easily dissolve
in DMSO
- allows preparation of DMSO stocks
- Sets stage for later precipitation problems
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
- Large, lipophilic compound
- aqueous insoluble
- DMSO greatly helps aqueous solubility
- Very crystalline compound
- may show no computational problem
- no “rule of 5” violation
- aqueous insoluble
- high melting point
- strong intermolecular crystal lattice
- DMSO does not help aqueous solubility
|
|
20
|
- Compound has to make a “hole” in DMSO to dissolve
- easier to do this in DMSO than in water
- no H-bond donor / acceptor networks to disrupt
- DMSO has a high dielectric constant
- solvates compound dipoles
- almost all drugs have dipoles
|
|
21
|
- Compound disappears from DMSO solution
- What is the explanation?
- Chemical integrity in DMSO
- keep cold and frozen
- avoid oxygen
- keep dry
- Compound solubility in DMSO
- cold and / or frozen is the worst choice possible
- avoid freeze thaw cycles
|
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
- DMSO plus water exhibits very non ideal behavior
- change maximum at 33% by weight water
- corresponds to molar ratio 1 DMSO : 2 H2O
- liquid phase is very structured
- ice-1 like lattice structure
- more H-bonding, more order than in pure water
- Melting point declines from 18 deg C to –73 deg C
- Viscosity increases as water is added to DMSO
- Solution gets colder as water is added to DMSO
- (J Org Chem 2001, 66, 5846-5852)
|
|
24
|
|
|
25
|
- As H2O is added solvent is more structured
- More difficult to form a cavity
- More difficult to dissolve a large lipophilic compound
- Solubility non ideality is expected to be worst at 33% by weight H2O
|
|
26
|
|
|
27
|
- Parent compound
- Hydrate
- DMSO adduct
|
|
28
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
30
|
- Once a compound crystallizes from
DMSO it will not easily re-dissolve
- crystallized compound is in a lower energy, higher melting point, less
DMSO soluble form
- Narrow working window (time window) for keeping most compounds dissolved
in DMSO
- 1 to 2 days at room temperature
- explains why compounds are active when freshly made but not when stored
- Freeze thaw cycles increase the probability of crystallization
|
|
31
|
- Crystalline state is important to aqueous solubility
- Crystalline state is important to DMSO solubility
- be alert for compound precipitation from DMSO
- do not store liquid DMSO stocks in the refrigerator
- minimize time once DMSO stocks are diluted
- expect erratic HTS screening results dependent on minor compound
handling differences
- minimize freeze thaw cycles
- Poor DMSO solubility is here to stay
|
|
32
|
- The generous support of Pfizer Global R&D, Groton Labs in my post
retirement activities is gratefully acknowledged
|