Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
Stability of Compounds Stored in TekCel Plate Management System: Application of New Approaches for Ultra-High-Throughput Analysis of Compound Stability.
  • James A. Connelly Ph.D.
  • Director of Library Production and QC
  • Aventis Combinatorial Technologies Center
  • Tucson, Arizona
2
Overview
  • Integration of ACTC Combinatorial Chemistry Library Collection in Aventis Lead Generation Operations
    • Characteristics of ACTC and Aventis Collections
    • Compound Logistics Support of Multiple Screening Strategies
    • Integration into Global Compound Logistics Network (HPU)
  • TekCel System at ACTC and Future Plans
  • Comparison of Compound Purity in DMSO Solutions Stored in TekCel PlateStore versus Freezers
  • New Approaches for Surveillance of Purity Quality and Stability of Combinatorial Libraries
    • Ultra High-throughput Chromatography (Nanostream Veloce)
    • Flow-Injection Mass Spectrometry (Phoenix S&T)
    • Combined uHTC and FI-MS
    • Requirement for Highly Standardized Methods
3
Aventis Collection Attributes
  • Many “Solids” of Relatively Large Quantity
  • Liquid Screening and CP Stocks Created from Solids Stocks
  • Historical MedChem Compounds from HEP and COP Programs Purchased Compounds
  • Quality Criteria >80% Purity
  • Primary Stocks Handled as Single Containers
  • Stored in a Large Enterprise Level System


  • Produced as Liquid Stocks
  • Scaffold Based Combinatorial Libraries
  • Limited Compound Quantity
  • Variable Purity 75%>50% Purity
  • Plate Based Samples
  • Relatively Large libraries
  • Storage in Racks in Freezers
  • Manual Access for Screening and Cherry-picking


4
 
5
Aventis Combinatorial Library Collection
  • Naturally Exists as a Modular Set of Libraries
  • Produced in 96 Well Format
  • DMSO Liquid Stocks
  • 384 Well Plates as Screening and Cherry Picking Stocks
6
Aventis Screening Strategies
7
Global Compound Logistics Network
8
ACTC Compounds Delivered into Many Processes
  • Assembly of Aventis Rational Screening Sets
  • Compound Testing after Virtual Screening
  • Profiling, Biological, Physical and Pharmacological
  • ACTC (Local) Screening
  • Cherry-Picks for Activity and Structure Confirmation
    • Local and Global
  • Aventis Screening at Major Sites
    • Single Library Requests
    • Multiple Library Requests
    • Selected Compound Subsets
    • Screening Follow-up Activities
9
Solutions for Integration of ACTC Collection
  • Implement Global Compound Logistics Software and Database
  • Structuring ACTC Collection into 3 Stocks
    • Screening Stock to Enable 384/1536 Pin-Tool HTS
    • Cherry-Picking and Library Copy Stock
      • High Throughput, Rapid Response, Low Volume Needs
    • Archive Stock
      • Low Throughput, Refilling and Larger Volume Needs
  • TekCel PlateStore Systems for HTS and CP Activities
  • Future: Consideration of TubeStore/TekBench
10
TekCel Solution Initially Implemented at ACTC
11
 
12
Output of TekCel PlateStore System
13
 
14
Compound Purity/Stability Comparison
  • One  CC Library Analyzed, TL118 (12,232 Compounds)
  • 10 mM DMSO Solutions Stored for 1.5 Years Under Two Different Conditions
  • TekCel PlateStore Storage,
    • Nitrogen Purge, Minus 10 degrees C
    • Accessed Routinely for Cherry-Picking
  • Standard Storage
    • Freezers in Lidded Plates
    • Accessed 16 Times for Screening
  • Comparative Analysis of 384 Samples at Endpoint
15
Compound Stability/Purity (TekCel vs Standard)
16
Purity Variance (TekCel vs Standard)
17
Approaches for Compound QC/Stability
  • Standard LC/MS  (48 Samples/Day, MUX 384 Samples/Day)
    • Information Rich, Costly, Slow, Not Generally Standardized
    • Throughput Not Sufficient for Large Libraries (10,000)
  • Ultra High-Throughput Chromatography (1200 Samples/Day)
    • Less Information, Lower Cost, More Easily Standardized
    • Comparative Analysis Over Time Possible (If Standardizable)
  • Flow Injection MS Analysis (Current 2000 Sample/Day)
    • Less Information, Very Low Cost, ultra-HT, Standardizable?
    • Comparative Analysis Over Time Possible (If Standardizable)
  • Combined uHTC and FI-MS
  • Need Highly Standardized Methods
18
Nanostream Microfluidic Chromatography
19
Nanostream Veloce Microfluidic Chromatography
20
Comparison of Brio vs Standard HPLC
21
Comparison of LC/MS to uHTC plus FI-MS
  • 384 Samples from TL118 Were Analyzed Both by LC/MS and by uHTC plus FI-MS
  • Can uHTC plus FI-MS Results Provide Equivalent results as LC/MS?
  • Correctly Detected All Samples Without Expected Mass
  • Purity Class Binning Illustrates Need for Method Standardization in Both Approaches
  • uHTC plus FI-MS Could Potentially Be Used Instead of LC/MS for General Compound QC Operations
  • Key Advantages Are Standardizability and Low Cost
22
uHTC plus FI-MS vs LC/MS (ExMass Not Found)
23
Binning into Purity Categories (uHTC vs LC/MS)
24
Binning into Purity Categories (uHTC vs LC/MS)
25
Initial QC vs Re-Analysis (Same LC/MS Method)
26
Conclusions
  • TekCel PlateStore System Provides An Effective Mechanism for Integration of ACTC Collection into Global Aventis LG Operations
  • TekCel PlateStore Provides Greater Stability of DMSO Solutions as Compared to Our Previous Storage Conditions
  • New HT Analytical Technologies Hold Promise for Better Compound QC
  • Analytical Method Standardization is Essential for Effective Analysis of Compound Purity and Stability Over Time
27