|
1
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
- Biospecimen Resources encompassing large quantities of high-quality,
clinically annotated biospecimens are needed to:
- Identify and validate targets for detection, diagnosis, treatment,
and prevention
- Identify disease mechanisms
- Develop a molecular-based taxonomy of cancer
- Develop screening tests for “biomarkers” associated with certain
disease sub-types of a disease
- Group patients based on their genetic characteristics and likelihood of
positive response, for testing of new drugs
- Group patients based on the “biomarkers” of their disease to determine
which treatment is appropriate
- Biospecimen resources are critical to accelerate the development of
molecular-based diagnostics and therapeutics for personalized
medicine
|
|
4
|
- Diversity of cancer types and populations based on continual review of
researcher needs
- Access through a timely, centralized peer-review process
- Ethical and privacy compliance through a chain of trust
- Resources provided without intellectual property restrictions
- Pathology and clinical annotation (including longitudinal)
- State-of-the-art informatics system to streamline the research
production process and create in silico research capabilities
- Communication and outreach efforts
- Best practice and data-driven based SOPs to enable reproducible and
comparable (additive) results
|
|
5
|
- Heterogeneity in practices among NCI-supported programs has led to a
lack of:
- Common biospecimen resource SOPs, standards, and management principles
- Common definitions
- Computerized, common access to information on
specimens and cases
- Common approaches to ethical, legal, and policy issues
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
- Objective:
- Unify policies and procedures for NCI-supported biospecimen resources*
- *previously “biorepositories”
|
|
8
|
- Guidelines were reviewed prior to publication by:
- NIH Office of Science Policy
- DHHS Office for Human Research Protections
- NIH Office of Intramural Research
- NIH Office of Extramural Research
- NIH Office of Technology Transfer
- NIH Office of the General Council
- Guidelines were published in the Federal Register:
- Open public comment period, April-July 3, 2006
- Approximately 50 comments were received, on topics including:
- Biospecimen resource economics
- Informed consent requirements
- Definition clarity when designating biospecimen resources affected by
the Guidelines
|
|
9
|
- First-Generation Guidelines include recommendations for:
- Common best practices for research biospecimen resources
- Quality assurance and quality control programs
- Implementation of enabling informatics systems
- Addressing ethical, legal, and policy issues
- Establishing reporting mechanisms
- Providing administration and management structure (creation of the
OBBR)
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
- Handle specimens as appropriate for specimen type and study design
- Minimize collection/processing time as appropriate
- Develop a comprehensive Quality Management System, to include SOPs to
document all protocols and a training program for all appropriate
personnel
- Annotate specimens with key collection, processing, and storage data
- Monitor specimen inventory with a tracking system
- Store specimens in a stabilized state without unnecessary
thawing/refreezing. Dispose of specimens according to clear rules
- Review and document storage equipment performance on
a regular basis
- Follow specimen-appropriate biosafety, packaging, and
shipping procedures
- Train personnel to adhere to specimen shipping regulations. Control and
monitor required shipping temperature
|
|
13
|
- Collect and store relevant clinical and epidemiologic data associated
with a specimen, including longitudinal data, if applicable.*
- Use an informatics system that tracks all aspects of collection,
processing and distribution
- Comply with applicable privacy rules and human subjects regulations
|
|
14
|
- Assume that all specimens are potentially infectious – provide
appropriate vaccines, e.g., hepatitis
- Adhere to governmental and accrediting agency requirements
- Identify and address biosafety risks
- Record exposure incidents and provide personnel with
appropriate treatment
- Establish indemnification agreements with users of biospecimens (except
where prohibited by law)
- Develop additional policies and procedures as appropriate for chemical,
electrical, fire, occupational, and radiological safety
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
- Use a sample consent template
- Consider allowing research participants to specify the types of research
for which their specimens may be used
- Develop policies for handling specimens for which consent
has been withdrawn
- Develop clear policies for specimen and data access
- Develop policies for obtaining consent for studies involving children
- Consider special Food & Drug Administration regulations
- Establish and document transparent policies to govern the retention of
records and specimens
|
|
17
|
- Develop clear guidelines for sample distribution and clinical data
sharing (note: the Guidelines state that protocol-specific requirements
should be met before other access is considered)
- Ensure that investigators have timely, equitable, and appropriate
access, without undue administrative burden
- Charge for samples only to recover costs
- If a biospecimen resource needs to close, announce the availability of
specimens for transfer
- Restrict access to subjects’ identities and medical, genetic, social,
and personal histories via data access system with defined privilege
levels
|
|
18
|
- Protect the privacy of information and follow applicable regulations
- Follow documented policies on employee access to data
or specimens
- Provide levels of security that are appropriate to the type
of biospecimen resource
|
|
19
|
- For the transfer of materials, use a Material Transfer Agreement (MTA)
or similar formal agreement
- Biospecimen resource staff are not considered inventors within the
meaning of U.S. patent law and have no inherent rights to future
intellectual property
- MTAs should specify that research data obtained through the use of
biospecimen resource specimens and/or associated data should be made
available to the research community
|
|
20
|
- Technical and operational guidelines perceived to be beyond the
capability of smaller biospecimen resources, in terms of both technical
expertise and cost of compliance.
- Informatics requirements, particularly NCI’s caBIGTM, that
have not yet been fully developed and available for widespread adoption.
- Informed consent recommendations that went beyond current regulations
and were not clearly related to biospecimen collection and usage.
- That overall the Guidelines were too prescriptive and difficult for
smaller biospecimen resources to adopt.
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
- Office of Biorepositories and Biospecimen Research
- http://biospecimens.cancer.gov
|
|
23
|
- Functions and Priorities:
- Serve as a resource for NCI initiatives with biospecimen components,
such as The Cancer Genome Atlas and Clinical Proteomic Technologies for
Cancer Program
- Continue to work with the NCI Biorepository Coordinating Committee, a
group comprised of senior program managers who oversee biospecimen
resource-related programs across NCI intramural and extramural
divisions, to develop NCI
biospecimen policies and procedures
- Initiate a Biospecimen Research Network
- Develop responses to comments on the First-Generation Guidelines, and
plan for additional versions based on biospecimen research results
- Develop an educational program to inform NCI programs about the
Guidelines and other biospecimen issues
- In the longer term, develop biospecimen resource evaluation,
accreditation, and training programs
|
|
24
|
- What is Biospecimen Science?
- The multi-disciplinary field of study responsible for establishing tested
and proven biospecimen resource-related procedures based on
experimentation in the areas of specimen collection, processing,
shipping, and storage
- Why is it needed?
- Biospecimens are comprised of active and reactive living cells or cell
products, making them highly complex
- The collection, handling, and storage process can profoundly alter the
molecular profile and quality of biospecimens
- Such alterations, though artificial, can be misinterpreted as
disease-related or disease specific
- High degrees of sensitivity and specificity in new molecular techniques
raise the bar for analyte (specimen) data and quality
|
|
25
|
- Quality is not a generic concept
- Quality of human biospecimens is multi-factorial and is determined by
the:
- Type of specimen: (Normal tissue, Tumor tissue, Serum, Plasma)
- Physical state of the specimen
- Amount and type of specimen characterization data
- Amount and type of quality control exercised
- Amount and type of clinical data
- Permitted use of the specimen
- The analysis to be performed and the biomolecules targeted by the
analysis
- The goal of the research (application of the data)
|
|
26
|
- Antibiotics and other drugs
- Anesthesia
- Arterial clamp time
- Blood pressure variations
- Intra-op
- Blood loss
- Blood administration
- Fluid Administration
|
|
27
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
29
|
- Excerpt from the OBBR strategic plan:
- Outreach to Industrial and Academic Developers of New Technologies
- In order for the NCI biorepository guidelines, both first and
succeeding generations, to be effective, and for the Biospecimen
Research Network’s work to be relevant, it is critical for the OBBR to
enter into partnerships with companies and other entities that are
developing new technologies. These technologies could involve, for
example, new techniques for tissue fixation, new blood collection tubes
with special additives, or new storage technologies.
- Examples: explore dry state storage; alternate methods to collect
specimens for DNA (e.g. saliva); automation.
|
|
30
|
|
|
31
|
- Current examples:
- DNA extraction – Gentra AutoPure, Qiagen EZ-10, M-48
- Aliquoting – Tecan
- Obstacles (e.g. to using automated storage systems):
- Diversity of sample types
- Diversity of storage vessels – cryovials, variety of test tubes,
microplates
- Challenges/Opportunities:
- Growing collections of frozen samples are stretching budgets &
space. Need to develop automation
strategies for prospective collections based on pilot studies.
|
|
32
|
|